CLAIM: Jennifer Aniston Haircut Sign of Justin Theroux Wedding Trouble

Truth rating: 0

11:43 am, November 14th, 2013

(Getty Images)

According to Life & Style, Jennifer Aniston’s haircut means she’s not marrying Justin Theroux.

Confused?

So is the tabloid.

Life & Style, which last year falsely reported that the couple was preparing for the arrival of a baby, now claims that Aniston’s new bob “says more about the status of her relationship with [Theroux] than anything else.”

How so?

“Jen loves her hair long,” a so-called “insider” explains to the magazine. “She thinks it’s her thing.”

And, because “every bride wants to feel her best when she says ‘I do’ to the man of her dreams,” says Life & Style, this new short cut has delayed the wedding.

Calling her haircut an “extreme makeover,” the tabloid suggests that Theroux will now “have to wait to see his fiancee dressed in white.”

Um, except the couple was already waiting to wed.

That doesn’t seem to matter to Life & Style.

“If Justin were to change his mind and want to get married tomorrow, Jen would probably say no — and that would be a shock for him,” a source tells the tab. “She’s doing what she wants right now, haircuts included.”

What a remarkably peculiar thing to say.

In other words, Aniston and Theroux don’t plan to get married soon… but if they did, her new haircut would be a red flag that she doesn’t want to tie the knot?

Maybe an outlet that said the couple was racing to the altar more than a year and a half ago shouldn’t be trusted to speculate about their nuptials timetable.

A source close to the situation tells Gossip Cop the report is “weird and wrong.”

Follow @GossipCop on Twitter!

Like us on Facebook!

Sign up for Gossip Cop’s daily newsletter.

You might like:

Continue Reading

Justin Theroux Getting Cozy With “Mystery Blonde” at Party Without Jennifer Aniston?

Truth rating: 0

6:42 pm, November 13th, 2013

(Getty Images)

Justin Theroux attended last weekend’s 40th birthday party celebration for Robert Downey, Jr.’s wife Susan.

His fiancee Jennifer Aniston happened not to be there.

Star magazine tries to turn this complete non-story into a scandal.

The tabloid, which has published some outrageously wrong things about the couple this year, swings and misses yet again with its latest report, trying to portray Aniston’s absence as an opportunity for Theroux to stray.

“Because it was a family event, people were stunned to see that Jennifer didn’t attend with Justin,” says one so-called “eyewitness” for Star.

According to the magazine, “eyebrows were raised even further when Justin was spotted getting affectionate with an attractive blonde, even sharing an embrace with the mystery woman.”

“He gave her a friendly kiss and a hug when she walked up, which is normal,” says the Star source. “But what was abnormal was the fact that they were touchy-feely and stood around with their arms around each other.”

The eyewitness adds, “Justin’s close affection with the blonde was definitely the talk of the party.”

Uh-huh.

Maybe Star should find an eyewitness who’s better with identifying famous people.

Because the “mystery woman” who hugged Theroux at the party was Trudie Styler, Sting’s wife and a longtime friend of Theroux’s.

“They were saying goodbye upon leaving the party,” a source close to the situation tells Gossip Cop, calling the story suggesting that something scandalous had happened “ridiculous.”

Oops.

Follow @GossipCop on Twitter!

Like us on Facebook!

Sign up for Gossip Cop’s daily newsletter.

You might like:

Continue Reading

Jennifer Aniston NOT Pregnant, Despite Another Embarrassing OK! Cover Story

Truth rating: 0

2:18 pm, November 13th, 2013

(OK!)

Jennifer Aniston is not pregnant, despite yet another hugely embarrassing cover story from OK! magazine.

The tabloid is guilty of being as unoriginal as it is wrong.

Last month, OK! said Aniston was pregnant with “twin boys.”

That was an outright falsehood.

OK! previously misled its readers with stories about the actress and Justin Theroux supposedly expecting twins on three separate occasions over the past two years.

None of those reports was true.

OK! has terrible Jennifer Aniston sources and no clue what’s going on with the actress.

This week, the magazine adds a new bogus element about Theroux allegedly abandoning Aniston for work reasons just when she was attempting to plan their wedding.

(Of course, OK! claimed to have “all the details” about the couple’s wedding in a bogus August cover story.)

(Oh, and that was after OK! falsely said they eloped last Christmas.)

Again: OK! has terrible Jennifer Aniston sources and no clue what’s going on with the actress.

This latest sad cover story is more of the same.

Aniston is not “pregnant and alone.”

A source close to the situation tells Gossip Cop the report is “false.”

Follow @GossipCop on Twitter!

Like us on Facebook!

Sign up for Gossip Cop’s daily newsletter.

You might like:

Continue Reading